<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Computing World &#187; Philip Howard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/author/philip-howard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk</link>
	<description>IT Thought Leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Understanding FATCA And Data Governance</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/understanding-fatca-and-data-governance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/understanding-fatca-and-data-governance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assessment service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basel III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FATCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MiFid II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participating company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solvency II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withholding tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=20452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
All the recent compliance headlines in the financial services sector, at least in the UK and Europe, have been around Solvency II, Basel III and MiFid II. A regulation that has been largely overlooked (except by Trillium (which has just announced the Trillium FATCA Compliance Data Assessment service) by the IT industry is FATCA.
FATCA (foreign [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/understanding-fatca-and-data-governance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplifying ETL</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/simplifying-etl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/simplifying-etl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datatype conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netezza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oltp system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic layer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software front]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synonyms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesaurus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=20394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have just got back from the Netezza user conference and there was an interesting presentation on using IBM&#8217;s Information Server in conjunction with Netezza. The major bone of contention during the presentation, which caused much discussion, was that while most customers and prospects for Netezza were drawn, at least in part, to its simplicity, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/simplifying-etl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hadapt Is The Latest Big Data Database Offering</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/hadapt-is-the-latest-big-data-database-offering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/hadapt-is-the-latest-big-data-database-offering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hadapt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load balancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=19947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The latest entry into the BDDB (big data database) market is Hadapt, which has just announced the public beta (it has been in private beta since June) of its eponymous product.
What is interesting, and different, about Hadapt is that it has a hybrid database with two storage engines. One of these is HDFS (Hadoop distributed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/hadapt-is-the-latest-big-data-database-offering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breakthrough And Instrumented Applications</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/breakthrough-and-instrumented-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/breakthrough-and-instrumented-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakthrough applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clickstream data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM Informix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM Netezza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infobright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InsureTheBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InterSystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor insurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optalert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=19816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Breakthrough applications are the flip side of big data. They don&#8217;t necessarily involve huge amounts of data but they do typically involve some of the same sort of data that is often associated with big data. That is: sensor-based, web-based, log-based and similar data.
However, I don&#8217;t think that &#8216;breakthrough&#8217; applications is very good term. After [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/breakthrough-and-instrumented-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The data replication market is hotting up big time</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-data-replication-market-is-hotting-up-big-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-data-replication-market-is-hotting-up-big-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataMirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldengate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sybase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WisdomForce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero downtime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=18249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are loads of vendors that provide data replication for back-up and recovery purposes but there are not many that (also) target operational and business intelligence environments. For example, Symantec, EMC and Novell are all in the former camp but they don&#8217;t target BI.
In fact, there are only a little more than half a dozen [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-data-replication-market-is-hotting-up-big-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MapR is the next generation distribution for Apache Hadoop</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/mapr-is-the-next-generation-distribution-for-apache-hadoop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/mapr-is-the-next-generation-distribution-for-apache-hadoop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checkpoints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobtracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MapR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NameNode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=15635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The market around Hadoop has historically been very gentlemanly. In most cases when open source products become popular you end up with multiple competing distributions. Look at Linux for example. However, that has not, until recently, been the case with Hadoop, with both IBM and Yahoo! announcing that they were going to stick with the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/mapr-is-the-next-generation-distribution-for-apache-hadoop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The enterprise data warehouse is dead!</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-enterprise-data-warehouse-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-enterprise-data-warehouse-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise data warehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monty python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parrot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relational database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sas analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=15633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often when you see this sort of heading you expect to read something like &#8220;long live the EDW&#8221; later in the piece. Not this time. The EDW (enterprise data warehouse) is dead. Period. Like a dodo. Like Monty Python&#8217;s parrot.
This came up last week at SAS&#8217; analyst conference in Athens. I was having dinner with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-enterprise-data-warehouse-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you combine structured and unstructured data for query purposes?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-do-you-combine-structured-and-unstructured-data-for-query-purposes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-do-you-combine-structured-and-unstructured-data-for-query-purposes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ArdentiaSearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aster data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composite software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connexica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CXAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenplum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapreduce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoSQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[query capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[query environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalability issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support query]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teradata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unstructured data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=15318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most companies exploring the use of big data for business intelligence purposes do not simply want to analyse unstructured data, they also want to combine the results of that analysis with relevant structured data. They want their analytics to span all sorts of data, which we may refer to as hybrid data.
Unfortunately, NoSQL data stores [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-do-you-combine-structured-and-unstructured-data-for-query-purposes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connexica&#8217;s CXAIR looks especially well positioned</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/connexicas-cxair-looks-especially-well-positioned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/connexicas-cxair-looks-especially-well-positioned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connexica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crystal reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CXAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double metaphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inexperienced users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[query capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relational data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soundex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unstructured data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=15316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CXAIR from Connexica (which was previously Ardentia Search) is a BI tool specifically designed to support queries that span both structured and unstructured data, though it can equally well handle either one or the other on its own. It uses indexing (as in search-based indexing not database indexing) to extract structure from text, spreadsheets and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/connexicas-cxair-looks-especially-well-positioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data governance disappoints</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/data-governance-disappoints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/data-governance-disappoints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 12:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adherence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ataccama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mifid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoSQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organisational issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organisations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI DSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevant fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprinkling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=14209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second year in a row I am on the judging panel for the best practice data governance award for the International Data Governance and Information Quality Conference in San Diego in June.
As a result, a get to see a lot of high quality, detailed submissions from the various organisations that put themselves forward [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/data-governance-disappoints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Size isn&#8217;t everything</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/size-isnt-everthing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/size-isnt-everthing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 11:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytic techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clickstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java programmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapreduce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suggestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transactional data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unstructured data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=14111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a lot of confusion around “big data”. People naturally assume that big data means lots of data. Which is true. But it isn’t any old data or, at least it doesn’t have to be. The reason I bring this up is because just last week I heard about a company investigating the possibility [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/size-isnt-everthing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did Datanomic turn things around?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-did-datanomic-turn-things-around/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-did-datanomic-turn-things-around/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti money laundering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datanomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=13913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle is acquiring Datanomic. Rumours have been floating around about Datanomic being acquired for some weeks so it hardly comes as a surprise. Figures have not been disclosed but no doubt they will keep Datanomic’s shareholders warm at night.
For a change, I am not going to discuss how this will impact the market or whether [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-did-datanomic-turn-things-around/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exasol knocks benchmarks for six</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/exasol-knocks-benchmarks-for-six/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/exasol-knocks-benchmarks-for-six/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell poweredge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exasol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle 11g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=13874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long time readers will know, I don’t hold any particular truck with benchmarks. They are too generic, too easily fiddled and lots of vendors don’t bother with them so they only represent a limited sample of the market. Proofs of concept with your own data and your own queries (in the case for data [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/exasol-knocks-benchmarks-for-six/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A collaborative approach to SIEM might be more appropriate</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/a-collaborative-approach-to-siem-might-be-more-appropriate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/a-collaborative-approach-to-siem-might-be-more-appropriate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcsight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ArcSight ESM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ArcSight Logger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinxi One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incoming events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infosec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[log management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patterns of behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIM One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suitable models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=13790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Infosec taking place this week my thoughts are naturally turning towards the security market in general and SIEM (security information and event management) in particular. Long-time readers will know that I have two major concerns about the SIEM market in general, the first being with respect to real-time analysis of event data and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/a-collaborative-approach-to-siem-might-be-more-appropriate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplement: A new take on an old problem</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/simplement-a-new-take-on-an-old-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/simplement-a-new-take-on-an-old-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Howard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data volumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldengate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVR Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft isv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[query capability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sap implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql server database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sybase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume replicator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=13786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those readers with an elephantine memory may recall that I have written about HVR (High Volume Replicator) from HVR Software (previously PSB) twice in the past: in 2004 and 2006. The company recently came up again while I was talking with Simplement.
Simplement is in the business intelligence space, specifically targeting query capability against SAP-based operational [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/simplement-a-new-take-on-an-old-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

