<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Computing World &#187; Rik Ferguson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/author/rik-ferguson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk</link>
	<description>IT Thought Leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ACTA, Entrench And Resist?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/acta-entrench-and-resist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/acta-entrench-and-resist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal grey area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=21370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In the security presentation game, we spend a lot of time talking about “bad actors”, today it has a somewhat different meaning. The concerns with ACTA centre mostly around how the bill enforces liability on website for any links that point to disputed content and how ISPs may be obliged to dig deeper into their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/acta-entrench-and-resist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can&#8217;t Fight The Power, But The Power Has Shifted</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/you-cant-fight-the-power-but-the-power-has-shifted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/you-cant-fight-the-power-but-the-power-has-shifted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddos attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacktivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maximum penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sympathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scribd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web monitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=21136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One of the largest file sharing services on the Internet was shut down yesterday in US legal action. The site is charged with violation of copyright laws. The indictment (now available on scribd) charges seven individuals with online piracy, four of whom have already been arrested in New Zealand.
This 72 page document also details the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/you-cant-fight-the-power-but-the-power-has-shifted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PayPal&#8217;s Dispute Resolution Is Destructive</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/paypals-dispute-resolution-is-destructive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/paypals-dispute-resolution-is-destructive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eCommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french violin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paypal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violin sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world war ii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=20811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While paying a visit to the fantastically disturbing Regretsy site today I couldn’t help but be amazed by the sorry tale that was submitted by a regular visitor to the site.
A lady by the name of Erica relates in her email how she had sold ”an old French violin”  (in her words a pre-World [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/paypals-dispute-resolution-is-destructive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is A &#8220;Defensive Virus&#8221; The Best Way To Protect?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/is-a-defensive-virus-the-best-way-to-protect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/is-a-defensive-virus-the-best-way-to-protect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japanese government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious worm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor cycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system components]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=20777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A report in the Daily Yomiuri suggests that the Japanese government have commissioned Fujitsu Ltd to create a “defensive virus” and that after 3 years of work and a budget of $2.3 million, the project is nearing completion.
Technical details in the article are necessarily thin on the ground but it appears that the “cyberweapon” is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/is-a-defensive-virus-the-best-way-to-protect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Sure You&#8217;re Verified By Visa?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/are-you-sure-youre-verified-by-visa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/are-you-sure-youre-verified-by-visa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card issuers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa mastercard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=20185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2001 Visa introduced a security protocol they called 3DS, short for 3 Domain Secure in an attempt to reduce the incidence of credit card fraud in online purchases. 3DS is better known by the names used by the various card issuers when they implement the system “Verified by Visa“, “MasterCard Secure Code“, “J/Secure” (JCB [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/are-you-sure-youre-verified-by-visa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mobile Threat: FUD Or MUD?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-mobile-threat-fud-or-mud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-mobile-threat-fud-or-mud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketplaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=19960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Preface: This blog is not about open source vs closed, it’s also not about Android vs iOS or any other mobile operating system. It’s about criminals vs people, it’s about hype and reality and it’s about knee-jerk self-preservation vs openness and consideration.
Last Wednesday, Chris DiBona (Open Source Programs Manager at Google Inc.) made a post [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/the-mobile-threat-fud-or-mud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony prevents another hack attack</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/sony-prevents-another-hack-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/sony-prevents-another-hack-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brute force attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony playstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=18365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News reports are characterising an attack against the Sony PlayStation Network (PSN) and Sony Entertainment Online (SOE) as “another hack” or “Sony hacked again“. However, according to a blog post from Sony’s SVP and Chief Information Security Officer, that simply isn’t the case.
The attack against PSN accounts belonging to Sony subscribers went like this… Person [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/sony-prevents-another-hack-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Facebook&#8217;s new Timeline layout will affect your privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-facebooks-new-timeline-layout-will-affect-your-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-facebooks-new-timeline-layout-will-affect-your-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f8 Facebook Developer Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gregg keizer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=17935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the forthcoming Facebook profile changes announced earlier this week at the f8 Facebook Developer Conference, there has been a lot of talk online about how the new Timeline layout of your user profile will affect your privacy.
Essentially Facebook is taking all of the information that you have already entered into the social network, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/how-facebooks-new-timeline-layout-will-affect-your-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the DigiNotar breach affect your business?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/does-the-diginotar-breach-affect-your-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/does-the-diginotar-breach-affect-your-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credentials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csv file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DigiNotar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypted communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxy server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valid certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=17145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story that has been slowly breaking over the past few days regarding the compromise at Dutch certificate authority DigiNotar and the subsequent “theft” of many important credentials is one that is of huge importance for internet users, governments and even the trust foundation that underlies the internet in general.
What has happened exactly?
DigiNotar is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/does-the-diginotar-breach-affect-your-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Anonymous be able to &#8220;kill&#8221; Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/will-anonymous-be-able-to-kill-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/will-anonymous-be-able-to-kill-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accusations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authoritarian governments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masterstroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=16720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new video (which has now been removed), Anonymous or at least an element of the “loose online collective” (how much am I growing to despise that term?) has announced plans for a coordinated attack on Facebook to be launched on the auspicious date (at least here in the UK) of the 5th of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/will-anonymous-be-able-to-kill-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 security questions you must ask your SaaS provider</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/5-security-questions-you-must-ask-your-saas-provider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/5-security-questions-you-must-ask-your-saas-provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer relationship management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epsilon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resource management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML/SOAP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=16703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Software as a Service is seeing sustained growth and sustained adoption in both enterprise and in the home. According to a Gartner release in July 2011, Software as a Service revenue reached $10 billion in 2010 and is still growing. In fact Gartner estimate growth of over 20% 10 $12.1 billion on 2011.
The Gartner definition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/5-security-questions-you-must-ask-your-saas-provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why don&#8217;t cybercrime rewards work?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/why-dont-cybercrime-rewards-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/why-dont-cybercrime-rewards-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bounties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Anti-Virus Reward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mydoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudonyms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reward money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reward program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rewards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rustock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sasser worm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sven jaschan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=16309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rewards have been offered for information leading to the arrest of high-profile malware creators/operators for some time. How successful have those various initiatives been, and what are the limiting factors?
The Microsoft Anti-Virus Reward program has been around since late 2003, bounties have been offered for the creators of Sasser, Sobig, Blaster, Conficker and now Rustock, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/why-dont-cybercrime-rewards-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Sec is not a cause, it&#8217;s an excuse</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/anti-sec-is-not-a-cause-its-an-excuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/anti-sec-is-not-a-cause-its-an-excuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous lulz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberpunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infraguard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocent internet users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italian hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italian student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italian university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LulzSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation AntiSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety and security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=15906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move clearly inspired by LulzSec, an Italian hacker recently uploaded a torrent containing personal information of thousands of Italian university students. This information was stolen from a slew of Italian university websites. According to the press release posted by Lulzstorm this was done “to tell every Italian student how little secure their personal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/anti-sec-is-not-a-cause-its-an-excuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the hack is going on?</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/what-the-hack-is-going-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/what-the-hack-is-going-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citibank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cult of the dead cow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Denial of Service attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epsilon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legion of doom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LulzSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MasterCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masters of deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[providing software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=15356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the recent news stories of successful hacking attacks of some very prominent organisations, this seems like an entirely reasonable question.
The litany of victims is impressive including such luminaries as Google, RSA, Visa, MasterCard, Citibank, Epsilon, the US Senate, the UK National Health Service, Fox, Sony (of course) and just last night the CIA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/what-the-hack-is-going-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As the Mac market expands, so does its potential to the cyber-criminal</title>
		<link>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/as-the-mac-market-expands-so-does-its-potential-to-the-cyber-criminal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/as-the-mac-market-expands-so-does-its-potential-to-the-cyber-criminal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 10:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admin password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMunizator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infected computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Defender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world of windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/?p=14929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have read in the press recently about the Mac Defender scareware that is affecting many OSX users, to the extent that Apple have even promised to deliver a removal tool and a fix to their customers. You may be surprised to hear though that Mac Defender is not the first “scareware” application targeting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businesscomputingworld.co.uk/as-the-mac-market-expands-so-does-its-potential-to-the-cyber-criminal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://movies.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/trustmac_480x376.mov" length="3612234" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

