Can the law overrule social media?

Facebook was the first to confirm its attendance at today’s meeting with the Home Secretary to discuss how social media contributed to the English riots.

Social media providers Twitter and Blackberry have also been scrutinised regarding the use of their services to coordinate violent behaviour; however, the evidence suggests that social media is in fact the key to preventing future civil unrest.

Ignorance is not bliss

Real-time information not only kept people informed of where the trouble was brewing and which places had already been targeted, but also provided much needed reassurance for friends and families.

David Cameron himself recognised that “a free flow of information can be used for good” and this was demonstrated by the spontaneous mass clean-ups organised overnight. Some police forces in the UK already use social media as a central source of intelligence when they suspect criminal activity, encouraging online discussions rather than seeking to disrupt them.

In light of the advantages of using social media, many believe that the government’s reactive proposition to disconnect these platforms in the event of future uprisings would aggravate those already harbouring negative attitudes. Chaos is more likely to escalate in a scenario where preferred sources of real-time news are unavailable.

An exception to the rule

This year has seen a number of instances in which social media has been at the core of controversial issues; from super-injunctions, to political revolutions, to the phone-hacking scandal.

As a result there is a greater demand for clarity surrounding professional use of social media given the attractions of using this platform to communicate. At what point is it acceptable for the law to intercept the uncensored content exchanged through social media?

Currently, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) permits the police access to personal BBM messages or other social media content if they originate from a UK network and it can be demonstrated that the information relates to criminal behaviour.

However, wider monitoring of conversations taking place on social media sites and the BBM service (a closed network) would require new laws and additional resource.

Keep talking

Communities should be encouraged to collaborate online while those in authority should immerse themselves in social media to maximise their visibility amongst local people. In this way, social media will enable dialogue between people who wouldn’t usually have the opportunity to interact; and social interaction is more beneficial than social censorship.

SHARETweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestDigg thisShare on RedditShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Bernadette Palmer MA ICM, Dip ICM has been with The Security Company (TSC) for five years as Senior Communications Consultant. Bernadette’s in-depth understanding of the communications environment and the role of security awareness within organisations has been an invaluable asset for TSC in winning business from a wide range of companies. Before working for TSC, Bernadette was the Senior Employee Communications Manager for BT Major Business, BT Business and BT Products and Services; where she managed a team of communication specialists delivering a suite of services to internal clients. Prior to this Bernadette worked as the Security Awareness Manager for BT Security for six years where she gained an invaluable insight into the world of security within organisations.